In the pantheon of iconic small cars from the 1980s and 1990s, the Peugeot 205 and Rover Metro stand out as two of the most memorable and influential models. Both cars were beloved for their nimble handling, efficient use of space, and accessible pricing. This detailed road test will compare these two hatchbacks across various parameters, including design, performance, interior comfort, handling, and practicality.
Design and Styling
Peugeot 205
The Peugeot 205, introduced in 1983, became a design icon almost instantly. Styled by Pininfarina, the 205 boasted clean lines, a balanced profile, and a distinctive charm that made it stand out in the small car segment. The car’s compact dimensions and sharp angles gave it a sporty appearance, while the black plastic bumpers added to its practical and rugged look. The GTI version, with its body-colored bumpers and sporty trimmings, further enhanced the car’s visual appeal, making it an object of desire among young drivers and enthusiasts.
Rover Metro
The Rover Metro, launched as the Austin Metro in 1980 and later rebranded as the Rover Metro in 1990, presented a more conservative but equally charming design. The Metro’s boxy shape and large glass areas contributed to its spacious feel, while the facelift in 1990 introduced softer, more rounded edges that modernized its appearance. The Rover Metro aimed for a more understated elegance compared to the 205, with a focus on practicality and efficient use of space. The later versions, especially the Metro GTa and GTi, incorporated sporty elements that gave the car a more dynamic look.
Performance and Drivetrain
Peugeot 205
The Peugeot 205 range offered a variety of engines, from small-displacement petrol engines to robust diesel options. The standout performer in the lineup was undoubtedly the 205 GTI, available with a 1.6-liter or 1.9-liter engine. The 1.6 GTI produced around 105 horsepower, while the 1.9 GTI delivered a thrilling 130 horsepower. These engines were mated to a crisp five-speed manual gearbox, offering an engaging driving experience. The 205’s lightweight construction (starting around 800 kg for base models) further enhanced its performance, making it a joy to drive in both urban and rural settings.
Rover Metro
The Rover Metro offered a range of A-series and later K-series engines. The 1.1 and 1.4-liter K-series engines were particularly noteworthy, providing a good balance of power and efficiency. The 1.4 GTa and GTi models, producing 95 and 103 horsepower respectively, were the top performers. These engines, coupled with a five-speed manual transmission, delivered decent acceleration and respectable top speeds. The Metro’s lightweight design (starting around 850 kg) ensured nimble handling and good fuel economy, making it a practical choice for city driving.
Handling and Ride Quality
Peugeot 205
One of the defining characteristics of the Peugeot 205 was its exceptional handling. The car’s MacPherson strut front suspension and torsion beam rear axle provided a balanced and responsive ride. The steering was direct and communicative, giving the driver confidence in corners. The 205 GTI, in particular, was praised for its agility and grip, making it one of the best-handling small cars of its time. Even the base models offered a comfortable ride quality, soaking up bumps and imperfections with ease.
Rover Metro
The Rover Metro’s Hydragas suspension system was its standout feature, providing a smooth and composed ride. This system used interconnected fluid and gas-filled spheres to absorb shocks, offering a level of comfort typically found in larger cars. The Metro’s handling was predictable and stable, with light and precise steering that made it easy to maneuver in tight spaces. While not as sporty as the 205, the Metro GTa and GTi models delivered a spirited driving experience, with improved suspension tuning and wider tires for better grip.
Interior Comfort and Features
Peugeot 205
Inside, the Peugeot 205 offered a driver-focused cabin with a simple yet functional design. The dashboard layout was straightforward, with easy-to-read gauges and accessible controls. The seats were supportive, with enough adjustability to suit drivers of various sizes. While the base models were sparsely equipped, the higher trims and GTI versions included amenities such as sport seats, electric windows, and a sunroof. The 205’s compact dimensions meant that rear seat space was limited, but the clever use of space ensured that it never felt cramped.
Rover Metro
The Rover Metro’s interior was designed with practicality and comfort in mind. The boxy shape allowed for a spacious cabin, with ample headroom and legroom for both front and rear passengers. The dashboard design was more modern than that of the early 205, with a clean and functional layout. Higher trim levels featured comfortable seats with good support, as well as conveniences like electric windows, central locking, and a decent sound system. The Metro also offered a surprising amount of cargo space for a small car, with a versatile rear seat that could be folded down to increase the luggage area.
Practicality and Economy
Peugeot 205
The Peugeot 205 excelled in offering a practical solution for everyday driving. Its compact size made it easy to park and maneuver in city traffic, while the efficient engines ensured low running costs. The diesel versions, in particular, were known for their impressive fuel economy, often exceeding 50 mpg. The 205 also had a reputation for reliability, with many examples still running strong decades after they were first built. The hatchback design provided decent cargo space, making it a versatile choice for small families or those needing to carry occasional loads.
Rover Metro
The Rover Metro was equally practical, with a focus on maximizing interior space within its compact footprint. The Hydragas suspension contributed to a comfortable ride, even on rough roads, making it a practical choice for a variety of driving conditions. The Metro’s efficient engines delivered good fuel economy, with the K-series engines being particularly frugal. The car’s low insurance group and affordable maintenance costs made it an attractive option for budget-conscious drivers. The flexible seating arrangement and ample cargo space added to its practicality, making it a versatile and economical choice for everyday use.
Legacy and Influence
Peugeot 205
The Peugeot 205 left an indelible mark on the automotive world. It was a commercial success, with over 5 million units sold during its production run. The 205 GTI, in particular, became a legend in the hot hatch segment, often cited as one of the best hot hatches ever made. The 205’s success helped establish Peugeot as a major player in the small car market and influenced the design and engineering of future models. Even today, the 205 is fondly remembered by enthusiasts and collectors, with well-preserved examples commanding high prices in the classic car market.
Rover Metro
The Rover Metro also enjoyed significant success, particularly in the UK where it was seen as a quintessentially British small car. Its evolution from the Austin Metro to the Rover Metro reflected the changes in the British automotive industry during the 1980s and 1990s. The Metro’s practicality, comfort, and affordability made it a popular choice among a wide range of drivers, from young professionals to retirees. Although it never achieved the same iconic status as the 205 GTI, the Metro is remembered as a reliable and versatile small car that served its owners well.
Conclusion
In comparing the Peugeot 205 and Rover Metro, it is clear that both cars had their unique strengths and appeal. The Peugeot 205, with its sporty design, engaging driving dynamics, and iconic GTI version, offered a thrilling and stylish option for those seeking a fun-to-drive small car. Its handling prowess and timeless design continue to be celebrated by enthusiasts.
The Rover Metro, on the other hand, prioritized practicality, comfort, and efficiency. Its spacious interior, smooth ride, and affordable running costs made it a sensible choice for everyday use. The Hydragas suspension system provided a level of comfort that was unmatched in its class, while the K-series engines delivered reliable performance and good fuel economy.
Ultimately, the choice between the Peugeot 205 and Rover Metro would come down to individual preferences and priorities. Drivers seeking a more dynamic and sporty experience would likely gravitate towards the 205, especially the GTI variants. Those looking for a practical, comfortable, and economical small car would find the Metro to be an excellent choice.
Both the Peugeot 205 and Rover Metro have earned their place in automotive history, each leaving a lasting legacy in the world of small cars. Whether remembered for their performance, practicality, or enduring charm, these two models continue to be celebrated by enthusiasts and collectors alike.
Court Guinness 